When uncertainty quantification fails: structural vulnerabilities and corrections for selective prediction under clinical class imbalance
Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-10-27 in cs.AI. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.
Published 2026-10-27 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-10-28
Category: cs.AI · 人工智能 · first seen 2026-10-28
Abstract
Background. Selective prediction systems improve the safety of clinical artificial intelligence by deferring ambiguous cases to human experts while automating high-confidence decisions. However, this safety mechanism relies entirely on the premise that uncertainty scores accurately reflect clinical ambiguity. In prognostic tasks characterized by severe class imbalance, where the clinical outcome o
Read on arXiv →
Cite this page: When uncertainty quantification fails: structural vulnerabilities and corrections for selective prediction under clinical class imbalance: the #118 most recent of 940 cs.AI papers we have recorded (as of 2026-10-27). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/when-uncertainty-quantification-fails-structural-vulnerabilities-and-corrections.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable:
papers.json
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free