Signals 4 · free daily AI digest

STEPQuant: When and Where Errors Matter in Delta-Rule Recurrent State Quantization

Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-29 in cs.AI. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.

Published 2026-09-29 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-30

Category: cs.AI · 人工智能 · first seen 2026-09-30

Abstract

Linear attention replaces growing KV caches with fixed-size recurrent states, yet these persistent states can become a substantial memory bottleneck under concurrent serving. Directly quantizing recurrent states to low precision often leads to severe accuracy degradation, as quantization errors propagate through successive state updates. We discover that the impact of these errors depends on two c

Read on arXiv →

#2 most recent of 460 cs.AI papers we have recorded · ↑ newer: Skill-Space Shooting for Autonomous Robot Policy Improvement · ↓ older: LeapQuant: Efficient Linear Attention with Accurate Recurrent State Qu
Cite this page: STEPQuant: When and Where Errors Matter in Delta-Rule Recurrent State Quantization: the #2 most recent of 460 cs.AI papers we have recorded (as of 2026-09-29). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/stepquant-when-and-where-errors-matter-in-delta-rule-recurrent-state-quantizatio.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable: papers.json
Related: More cs.AI papers · arXiv signals · All papers · Today in AI
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Subscribe free → See all plans →
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free
All models · All repos · By company · Daily editions