Signals 4 · free daily AI digest

Accurate but Not Humble: Evaluating Epistemic Humility in LLM Agents under Knowledge Conflict

Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-10-08 in cs.AI. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.

Published 2026-10-08 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-10-09

Category: cs.AI · 人工智能 · first seen 2026-10-09

Abstract

When retrieved evidence contradicts an agent's prior beliefs, does it revise its answer, acknowledge uncertainty, or persist with an incorrect conclusion? Existing evaluations of agentic systems focus primarily on task success, offering limited insight into how agents handle such conflicts. We propose to evaluate agents on epistemic humility (EH): the agent's willingness to recognize, act on, and

Read on arXiv →

#379 most recent of 960 cs.AI papers we have recorded · ↑ newer: Cited but Not Consulted: A Counterfactual Audit of Legal Chain-of-Thou · ↓ older: Distilling Routed 3D Privilege for Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Languag
Cite this page: Accurate but Not Humble: Evaluating Epistemic Humility in LLM Agents under Knowledge Conflict: the #379 most recent of 960 cs.AI papers we have recorded (as of 2026-10-08). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/accurate-but-not-humble-evaluating-epistemic-humility-in-llm-agents-under-knowle.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable: papers.json
Related: More cs.AI papers · arXiv signals · All papers · Today in AI
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Subscribe free → See all plans →
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free
All models · All repos · By company · Daily editions