Signals 4 · free daily AI digest

Who is the Pronoun Pro? Comparing LLMs and Humans at Number-Disambiguation of 'they'

Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-11-03 in cs.CL. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.

Published 2026-11-03 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-11-04

Category: cs.CL · 自然语言处理 · first seen 2026-11-04

Abstract

This study evaluates whether large language models (LLMs) can reliably replace or complement human research assistants in linguistically complex annotation. In a controlled annotation task, 73 human annotators (local students and crowdworkers with and without a background in linguistics) and more than 40 LLM configurations number-disambiguated 174 authentic uses of 'they' from Reddit, including in

Read on arXiv →

#9 most recent of 628 cs.CL papers we have recorded · ↑ newer: Whose Effect Is It? How Objectives Inflate Learned Subspace Interventi · ↓ older: Shuffled OPSD: When Semantic Consistency Hurts On-Policy Self-Distilla
Cite this page: Who is the Pronoun Pro? Comparing LLMs and Humans at Number-Disambiguation of 'they': the #9 most recent of 628 cs.CL papers we have recorded (as of 2026-11-03). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/who-is-the-pronoun-pro-comparing-llms-and-humans-at-number-disambiguation-of-the.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable: papers.json
Related: More cs.CL papers · arXiv signals · All papers · Today in AI
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Subscribe free → See all plans →
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free
All models · All repos · By company · Daily editions