Signals 4 · free daily AI digest

Who Is Sycophantic to Whom? Confident LLMs, Human Deference, and the Collapse of Trust Calibration

Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-10-22 in cs.AI. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.

Published 2026-10-22 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-10-23

Category: cs.AI · 人工智能 · first seen 2026-10-23

Abstract

Research on sycophancy asks whether large language models (LLMs) bend towards what their users want to hear. We ask the reverse question: when an LLM is confident, consistent, and wrong, do users bend towards it? In a within-subjects experiment, 32 participants learned up to five science topics by chatting with five assistants built on the same model (GPT-5-mini). Unknown to participants, each ass

Read on arXiv →

#192 most recent of 960 cs.AI papers we have recorded · ↑ newer: Would an LLM Match into a Residency? Uncertainty, Reasoning and Image · ↓ older: What Makes a Good Unmasking Policy? A Controlled Study of Learned Unma
Cite this page: Who Is Sycophantic to Whom? Confident LLMs, Human Deference, and the Collapse of Trust Calibration: the #192 most recent of 960 cs.AI papers we have recorded (as of 2026-10-22). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/who-is-sycophantic-to-whom-confident-llms-human-deference-and-the-collapse-of-tr.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable: papers.json
Related: More cs.AI papers · arXiv signals · All papers · Today in AI
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Subscribe free → See all plans →
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free
All models · All repos · By company · Daily editions