Signals 4 · free daily AI digest

Which one is banana man? Evaluating vision-language models in multi-turn pragmatic interpretation

Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-08-30 in cs.CL. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.

Published 2026-08-30 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-01

Category: cs.CL · 自然语言处理 · first seen 2026-09-01

Abstract

Flexible adaptation to context and shared pragmatic intuitions contribute to smooth human conversation. Iterated reference games---in which players repeatedly pick out novel referents using language---present a test case for agents' ability to perform context-sensitive pragmatic reasoning in multi-turn linguistic environments. We tested humans and vision--language models on their ability to identi

Read on arXiv →

#168 most recent of 186 cs.CL papers we have recorded · ↑ newer: SemTrace: Source-Grounded Semantic Signatures for Tracing LLM Exposure · ↓ older: OASIS: Optimizing Attacker Sequences for Hard-Label Black-Box Text Att
Cite this page: Which one is banana man? Evaluating vision-language models in multi-turn pragmatic interpretation: the #168 most recent of 186 cs.CL papers we have recorded (as of 2026-08-30). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/which-one-is-banana-man-evaluating-vision-language-models-in-multi-turn-pragmati.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable: papers.json
Related: More cs.CL papers · arXiv signals · All papers · Today in AI
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Subscribe free → See all plans →
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free
All models · All repos · By company · Daily editions