Signals 4 · free daily AI digest

When Guardrails Look Effective: Construct Validity Failures in LLM Agent Commerce Evaluation

Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-01 in cs.AI. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.

Published 2026-09-01 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-02

Category: cs.AI · 人工智能 · first seen 2026-09-02

Abstract

Interactive simulations increasingly evaluate policies in markets populated by language-model agents. Their outputs can look economic---prices, profits, consumer surplus, and welfare---without instantiating the behavior named in the claim. We audit this risk in a multi-turn buyer--seller testbed for configurable hotel transactions. An initial implementation reported welfare gains from two marketpl

Read on arXiv →

#238 most recent of 300 cs.AI papers we have recorded · ↑ newer: Relational-Core Graph Analytics Querying graphs at SQL scale, and why · ↓ older: TempCloze: Can Video-LLMs Identify the Missing Middle?
Cite this page: When Guardrails Look Effective: Construct Validity Failures in LLM Agent Commerce Evaluation: the #238 most recent of 300 cs.AI papers we have recorded (as of 2026-09-01). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/when-guardrails-look-effective-construct-validity-failures-in-llm-agent-commerce.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable: papers.json
Related: More cs.AI papers · arXiv signals · All papers · Today in AI
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Subscribe free → See all plans →
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free
All models · All repos · By company · Daily editions