Signals 4 · free daily AI digest

What Drives Recovery in Agentic Text-to-Cypher? LAST-CQ: An LLM Agent Self-Refinement Framework

Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-11 in cs.CL. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.

Published 2026-09-11 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-14

Category: cs.CL · 自然语言处理 · first seen 2026-09-14

Abstract

Agentic pipelines for structured-query generation are rapidly expanding, but it is unclear which part of the loop produces the gain. We use LAST-CQ -- a five-agent, training-free, execution-grounded Text-to-Cypher framework -- as an instrumented testbed, running three counterfactuals over 2,471 live-database queries and six backbones spanning three vendor scale tiers. Removing correction is worth

Read on arXiv →

#63 most recent of 186 cs.CL papers we have recorded · ↑ newer: Cognition on Graph: Navigating Massive Knowledge Space via Cognitive C · ↓ older: Residual Vector-based Reconstruction as Long-Context Recall Regardless
Cite this page: What Drives Recovery in Agentic Text-to-Cypher? LAST-CQ: An LLM Agent Self-Refinement Framework: the #63 most recent of 186 cs.CL papers we have recorded (as of 2026-09-11). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/what-drives-recovery-in-agentic-text-to-cypher-last-cq-an-llm-agent-self-refinem.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable: papers.json
Related: More cs.CL papers · arXiv signals · All papers · Today in AI
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Subscribe free → See all plans →
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free
All models · All repos · By company · Daily editions