Signals 4 · free daily AI digest

To Jev or Not? Evaluating the Accuracy and Efficiency of Structured Decision Models for Hate-Speech Moderation

Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-10-02 in cs.CL. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.

Published 2026-10-02 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-10-05

Category: cs.CL · 自然语言处理 · first seen 2026-10-05

Abstract

The scale of online content makes hate-speech moderation challenging, while Large Language Models (LLMs) enable harmful material to be produced and adapted more easily. Moderation therefore requires efficient classifiers that can accommodate different definitions of hate speech. Recent structured decision models accept natural-language criteria and select among specified answers, raising the quest

Read on arXiv →

#348 most recent of 660 cs.CL papers we have recorded · ↑ newer: SyntaxBench: A Statistical Diagnostic Framework for Character-Level Re · ↓ older: Shrome at Touché: Soft-Vote Ensembling and Counter-Causal Augmentation
Cite this page: To Jev or Not? Evaluating the Accuracy and Efficiency of Structured Decision Models for Hate-Speech Moderation: the #348 most recent of 660 cs.CL papers we have recorded (as of 2026-10-02). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/to-jev-or-not-evaluating-the-accuracy-and-efficiency-of-structured-decision-mode.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable: papers.json
Related: More cs.CL papers · arXiv signals · All papers · Today in AI
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Subscribe free → See all plans →
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free
All models · All repos · By company · Daily editions