Signals 4 · free daily AI digest

Target leakage, not model class, explains reported accuracy in survey-based cardiovascular screening: a leakage-tiered audit of glass-box and tabular foundation models

Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-10 in cs.CL. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.

Published 2026-09-10 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-11

Category: cs.CL · 自然语言处理 · first seen 2026-09-11

Abstract

Cardiovascular screening models trained on national health surveys routinely report areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) near 0.89. We asked whether that accuracy reflects learning or target leakage, whether tabular foundation models change the answer, and whether the properties deployment requires survive joint examination. We benchmarked ten classifiers spanning linear

Read on arXiv →

#71 most recent of 186 cs.CL papers we have recorded · ↑ newer: IndicTriMix: Developing Language Identification Datasets and Models fo · ↓ older: SpecGuard: Inference-Time Backdoor Detection For Free
Cite this page: Target leakage, not model class, explains reported accuracy in survey-based cardiovascular screening: a leakage-tiered audit of glass-box and tabular foundation models: the #71 most recent of 186 cs.CL papers we have recorded (as of 2026-09-10). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/target-leakage-not-model-class-explains-reported-accuracy-in-survey-based-cardio.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable: papers.json
Related: More cs.CL papers · arXiv signals · All papers · Today in AI
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Subscribe free → See all plans →
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free
All models · All repos · By company · Daily editions