Signals 4 · free daily AI digest

Should We Combine Our Data? Algorithms and Limits for Privately Assessing Data Sharing

Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-11-02 in cs.LG. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.

Published 2026-11-02 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-11-03

Category: cs.LG · 机器学习 · first seen 2026-11-03

Abstract

In this paper, we study when two parties should pool their data to train a machine learning model. Two agents, Alice and Bob, each hold a sensitive labeled dataset and want to train a classifier from a given hypothesis class $\mathcal{H}$. Even when each party's dataset can be perfectly classified on its own, the two parties may follow conflicting labeling standards or have selection biases that a

Read on arXiv →

#22 most recent of 703 cs.LG papers we have recorded · ↑ newer: Efficient Closure Learning in Dynamical Systems: A Comparison of Data- · ↓ older: Structured Visual Landscape: Generating Preferred Representations in B
Cite this page: Should We Combine Our Data? Algorithms and Limits for Privately Assessing Data Sharing: the #22 most recent of 703 cs.LG papers we have recorded (as of 2026-11-02). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/should-we-combine-our-data-algorithms-and-limits-for-privately-assessing-data-sh.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable: papers.json
Related: More cs.LG papers · arXiv signals · All papers · Today in AI
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Subscribe free → See all plans →
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free
All models · All repos · By company · Daily editions