Signals 4 · free daily AI digest

Scaling Near-Optimal SFT-RL Annotation Budget Allocation from Small to Large LLMs

Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-01 in cs.AI. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.

Published 2026-09-01 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-02

Category: cs.AI · 人工智能 · first seen 2026-09-02

Abstract

How to divide a fixed annotation budget between supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL) during LLM post-training remains an open problem. Existing work characterizes only broad trends (e.g., SFT dominates in low-data regimes), lacks a principled allocation framework, and does not examine whether the optimal ratio transfers across model sizes. We frame this problem in terms of

Read on arXiv →

#227 most recent of 300 cs.AI papers we have recorded · ↑ newer: Designing Proactive Thought Partners for Writing · ↓ older: Selective Agent Guidance via Entropy: Learning Autonomous Policies fro
Cite this page: Scaling Near-Optimal SFT-RL Annotation Budget Allocation from Small to Large LLMs: the #227 most recent of 300 cs.AI papers we have recorded (as of 2026-09-01). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/scaling-near-optimal-sft-rl-annotation-budget-allocation-from-small-to-large-llm.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable: papers.json
Related: More cs.AI papers · arXiv signals · All papers · Today in AI
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Subscribe free → See all plans →
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free
All models · All repos · By company · Daily editions