Signals 4 · free daily AI digest

Same Verdict, Different Readers: Personalizing Fact-Checking Explanations from Relative Preferences

Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-10-27 in cs.CL. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.

Published 2026-10-27 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-10-28

Category: cs.CL · 自然语言处理 · first seen 2026-10-28

Abstract

Fact-checking explanations help Web users understand why a claim receives its verdict, yet the same explanation may not satisfy readers with different backgrounds and preferences. We formulate Faithful Personalized Fact-Checking Explanation Rewriting, which adapts an existing explanation to individual readers while preserving factual fidelity. Rather than relying on reader-written reference explan

Read on arXiv →

#130 most recent of 660 cs.CL papers we have recorded · ↑ newer: LinMix: Data Mixing as Linear Domain Attribution · ↓ older: EmbeddingGemma 2: Unified and Efficient Multimodal Representations
Cite this page: Same Verdict, Different Readers: Personalizing Fact-Checking Explanations from Relative Preferences: the #130 most recent of 660 cs.CL papers we have recorded (as of 2026-10-27). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/same-verdict-different-readers-personalizing-fact-checking-explanations-from-rel.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable: papers.json
Related: More cs.CL papers · arXiv signals · All papers · Today in AI
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Subscribe free → See all plans →
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free
All models · All repos · By company · Daily editions