Signals 4 · free daily AI digest

Not Every Mention Is a Claim: Rethinking Object Hallucination Detection in Vision-Language Models

Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-10-16 in cs.CL. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.

Published 2026-10-16 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-10-19

Category: cs.CL · 自然语言处理 · first seen 2026-10-19

Abstract

Object hallucination in vision-language models (VLMs) is usually measured by checking each object a caption names against the image. Most benchmarks and detectors alike treat every object mention as a claim that the object is present. This assumption fails when a caption names an object without asserting it, as in "a bench for people to sit on", which mentions people without claiming that any are

Read on arXiv →

#229 most recent of 660 cs.CL papers we have recorded · ↑ newer: Trajectory-Triggered Sparse Collaborative Decoding · ↓ older: OmniVerifier-C1: Decomposed Graded Verifier for Rule-Governed Generati
Cite this page: Not Every Mention Is a Claim: Rethinking Object Hallucination Detection in Vision-Language Models: the #229 most recent of 660 cs.CL papers we have recorded (as of 2026-10-16). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/not-every-mention-is-a-claim-rethinking-object-hallucination-detection-in-vision.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable: papers.json
Related: More cs.CL papers · arXiv signals · All papers · Today in AI
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Subscribe free → See all plans →
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free
All models · All repos · By company · Daily editions