Signals 4 · free daily AI digest

Measure Before You Train: Typed Decision Models vs. a Classical Baseline vs. a Generative LLM for Routing a Personal Multilingual Inbox

Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-10-23 in cs.LG. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.

Published 2026-10-23 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-10-26

Category: cs.LG · 机器学习 · first seen 2026-10-26

Abstract

Personal email agents decide, for every message, what it is, whether it is urgent, whether to draft a reply, create a task, or ignore it. Their error rate is rarely measured: the stored labels were written by the system itself. We present Foyer, a self-hosted personal inbox agent in daily use, and a measurement protocol (stratified sampling, frozen snapshots, thread-grouped splits, pre-registered

Read on arXiv →

#177 most recent of 749 cs.LG papers we have recorded · ↑ newer: Flownomaly: Single-Step Conditional-Mean Recovery for Few-Shot Anomaly · ↓ older: Where Rounding Happens Matters: Rounding-Location Alignment Stabilizes
Cite this page: Measure Before You Train: Typed Decision Models vs. a Classical Baseline vs. a Generative LLM for Routing a Personal Multilingual Inbox: the #177 most recent of 749 cs.LG papers we have recorded (as of 2026-10-23). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/measure-before-you-train-typed-decision-models-vs-a-classical-baseline-vs-a-gene.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable: papers.json
Related: More cs.LG papers · arXiv signals · All papers · Today in AI
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Subscribe free → See all plans →
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free
All models · All repos · By company · Daily editions