LLM Judges Verify Presence, Not Absence: Omission Blindness in AI Clinical Notes and What Recovers It
Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-08-31 in cs.AI. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.
Published 2026-08-31 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-01
Category: cs.AI · 人工智能 · first seen 2026-09-01
Abstract
Ambient AI scribes draft clinical notes, and published audits find their dominant error is omission: information the encounter established that the note fails to record. The standard check is an LLM judge: a second model reads the note against the transcript and flags problems. We ask whether judges detect omissions. Public corpora cannot supply the answer key: their clinician reference notes and
Read on arXiv →
Cite this page: LLM Judges Verify Presence, Not Absence: Omission Blindness in AI Clinical Notes and What Recovers It: the #257 most recent of 300 cs.AI papers we have recorded (as of 2026-08-31). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/llm-judges-verify-presence-not-absence-omission-blindness-in-ai-clinical-notes-a.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable:
papers.json
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free