Signals 4 · free daily AI digest

LLM Judges Verify Presence, Not Absence: Omission Blindness in AI Clinical Notes and What Recovers It

Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-08-31 in cs.AI. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.

Published 2026-08-31 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-01

Category: cs.AI · 人工智能 · first seen 2026-09-01

Abstract

Ambient AI scribes draft clinical notes, and published audits find their dominant error is omission: information the encounter established that the note fails to record. The standard check is an LLM judge: a second model reads the note against the transcript and flags problems. We ask whether judges detect omissions. Public corpora cannot supply the answer key: their clinician reference notes and

Read on arXiv →

#257 most recent of 300 cs.AI papers we have recorded · ↑ newer: One note in three: a verified census of three deployed AI scribes, and · ↓ older: Stick to What You Know: A Study of Knowledge-Aligned Supervised Fine-T
Cite this page: LLM Judges Verify Presence, Not Absence: Omission Blindness in AI Clinical Notes and What Recovers It: the #257 most recent of 300 cs.AI papers we have recorded (as of 2026-08-31). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/llm-judges-verify-presence-not-absence-omission-blindness-in-ai-clinical-notes-a.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable: papers.json
Related: More cs.AI papers · arXiv signals · All papers · Today in AI
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Subscribe free → See all plans →
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free
All models · All repos · By company · Daily editions