Signals 4 · free daily AI digest

Language-model groups overstate consensus when replaying human deliberation on a reasoning task

Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-17 in cs.CL. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.

Published 2026-09-17 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-18

Category: cs.CL · 自然语言处理 · first seen 2026-09-18

Abstract

Full-consensus rates are often treated as indicators of collective cognition, yet depend on how participation and final states are operationalized. We replayed 100 held-out human Wason groups with matched large language model (LLM) agent groups, seeding one belief-anchored agent per participant's pre-discussion answer and scoring agents and people with the same code. Across human scoring definitio

Read on arXiv →

#12 most recent of 186 cs.CL papers we have recorded · ↑ newer: Steering the Compass: Aligning Dynamic Psychological Counseling Conver · ↓ older: PANORAMA: Panoptic Grounded Captioning via Mask Proposal Selection
Cite this page: Language-model groups overstate consensus when replaying human deliberation on a reasoning task: the #12 most recent of 186 cs.CL papers we have recorded (as of 2026-09-17). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/language-model-groups-overstate-consensus-when-replaying-human-deliberation-on-a.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable: papers.json
Related: More cs.CL papers · arXiv signals · All papers · Today in AI
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Subscribe free → See all plans →
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free
All models · All repos · By company · Daily editions