Signals 4 · free daily AI digest

Human-LLM Deliberation as Interactive Proof: Conditions for Verifiability Without Transparency

Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-21 in cs.CL. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.

Published 2026-09-21 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-22

Category: cs.CL · 自然语言处理 · first seen 2026-09-22

Abstract

When an LLM supplies an argument that a user could not readily construct, how can the user decide whether to accept its claim? Inspired by interactive proofs, we model human-LLM deliberation as an interaction between a prover with unrestricted internal search and a resource-bounded human verifier. The verifier requests and checks supporting details without access to the LLM's internal state. Passe

Read on arXiv →

#4 most recent of 212 cs.CL papers we have recorded · ↑ newer: ToneCL: Contrastive Learning for Few-Shot Syllable-Level Tone Classifi · ↓ older: SLICEChat: Progressive In-Encoder Token Pruning for Whole-Slide Pathol
Cite this page: Human-LLM Deliberation as Interactive Proof: Conditions for Verifiability Without Transparency: the #4 most recent of 212 cs.CL papers we have recorded (as of 2026-09-21). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/human-llm-deliberation-as-interactive-proof-conditions-for-verifiability-without.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable: papers.json
Related: More cs.CL papers · arXiv signals · All papers · Today in AI
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Subscribe free → See all plans →
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free
All models · All repos · By company · Daily editions