How Reproducible Are Evaluation Conclusions? A Self-Audit of LLM-Inferred Prompt Structure
Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-24 in cs.CL. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.
Published 2026-09-24 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-25
Category: cs.CL · 自然语言处理 · first seen 2026-09-25
Abstract
Evaluations of LLM systems routinely average over small prompt sets and report models as a ranked table. We ask how much confidence such a table deserves, using LLM-based prompt-structure inference as the case study: eight open model variants across five families and 8B to 675B parameters, caching disabled, 293 raw intermediate representations persisted. The measured phenomenon is unstable to begi
Read on arXiv →
Cite this page: How Reproducible Are Evaluation Conclusions? A Self-Audit of LLM-Inferred Prompt Structure: the #12 most recent of 252 cs.CL papers we have recorded (as of 2026-09-24). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/how-reproducible-are-evaluation-conclusions-a-self-audit-of-llm-inferred-prompt-.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable:
papers.json
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free