Signals 4 · free daily AI digest

How Much Should a VLA Trust Its Reasoning? Step-Level Guidance as a Measured Action-Value Function

Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-10-29 in cs.LG. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.

Published 2026-10-29 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-10-30

Category: cs.LG · 机器学习 · first seen 2026-10-30

Abstract

Reasoning vision-language-action (VLA) policies write a reasoning trace and then decode the action from it. A wrong trace yields a wrong action, and even a correct-looking trace can mislead the plan. Existing remedies ask whether the reasoning is right. We ask how strongly it should steer. CoC-CFG applies classifier-free guidance between the policy's context and the same context without the reason

Read on arXiv →

#85 most recent of 703 cs.LG papers we have recorded · ↑ newer: FIDE: Fiber-Informed Differentiable Experimental Design for Reference- · ↓ older: Enhancing Atrial Fibrillation Detection Through Hyperparameter Optimiz
Cite this page: How Much Should a VLA Trust Its Reasoning? Step-Level Guidance as a Measured Action-Value Function: the #85 most recent of 703 cs.LG papers we have recorded (as of 2026-10-29). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/how-much-should-a-vla-trust-its-reasoning-step-level-guidance-as-a-measured-acti.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable: papers.json
Related: More cs.LG papers · arXiv signals · All papers · Today in AI
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Subscribe free → See all plans →
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free
All models · All repos · By company · Daily editions