Signals 4 · free daily AI digest

Guardrail-Agnostic Societal Bias Evaluation in Large Vision-Language Models

Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-08-30 in cs.CV. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.

Published 2026-08-30 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-01

Category: cs.CV · 计算机视觉 · first seen 2026-09-01

Abstract

We propose a societal bias evaluation method for large vision-language models (LVLMs) in the era of strong safety guardrails. Existing benchmarks rely on prompts that ask models to infer attributes of people in images (e.g., "Is this person a CEO or a secretary?"). However, we find that LVLMs with strong guardrails, such as GPT and Claude, often refuse these prompts, making evaluations unreliable.

Read on arXiv →

#212 most recent of 237 cs.CV papers we have recorded · ↑ newer: RePair: Turning Retrieval Failures into Counterfactual Hard Pairs · ↓ older: TRINITY: A Multi-Perspective Benchmark for Personal-Style Video Highli
Cite this page: Guardrail-Agnostic Societal Bias Evaluation in Large Vision-Language Models: the #212 most recent of 237 cs.CV papers we have recorded (as of 2026-08-30). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/guardrail-agnostic-societal-bias-evaluation-in-large-vision-language-models.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable: papers.json
Related: More cs.CV papers · arXiv signals · All papers · Today in AI
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Subscribe free → See all plans →
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free
All models · All repos · By company · Daily editions