Signals 4 · free daily AI digest

Green Code or Costly Code? Evaluating the Energy Costs of Iterative LLM-Based Code Optimizations

Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-10-23 in cs.AI. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.

Published 2026-10-23 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-10-26

Category: cs.AI · 人工智能 · first seen 2026-10-26

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to optimize code for performance. This practice often assumes that improvements in execution speed naturally translate into overall lower energy consumption. We challenge this assumption empirically by measuring whether performance-optimized code produced by LLM self-refinement pipelines is also energy-efficient relative to canonical human referen

Read on arXiv →

#168 most recent of 960 cs.AI papers we have recorded · ↑ newer: SemantEq: Faithful Bidirectional Equivalence of Formal Statements · ↓ older: Closing the Modality Gap via Simplex-Constrained Representations
Cite this page: Green Code or Costly Code? Evaluating the Energy Costs of Iterative LLM-Based Code Optimizations: the #168 most recent of 960 cs.AI papers we have recorded (as of 2026-10-23). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/green-code-or-costly-code-evaluating-the-energy-costs-of-iterative-llm-based-cod.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable: papers.json
Related: More cs.AI papers · arXiv signals · All papers · Today in AI
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Subscribe free → See all plans →
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free
All models · All repos · By company · Daily editions