Signals 4 · free daily AI digest

Evaluating DeepSeek V4.1 Flash-1017 for loss of control and harmful manipulation risks

Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-10-26 in cs.CL. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.

Published 2026-10-26 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-10-27

Category: cs.CL · 自然语言处理 · first seen 2026-10-27

Abstract

As frontier language models grow increasingly capable and autonomous, independent third-party evaluations are critical for characterizing their systemic safety risks. While closed-source releases are routinely accompanied by comprehensive system cards, open-weight models receive less scrutiny regarding frontier risks. To address this gap, we present an independent safety evaluation of DeepSeek V4.

Read on arXiv →

#144 most recent of 660 cs.CL papers we have recorded · ↑ newer: Adapting LLM-SC to Living Sacred Heritage: Domain-Specific Extraction, · ↓ older: Improving JEV Entailment Reranking with Span Readouts and Selective Ad
Cite this page: Evaluating DeepSeek V4.1 Flash-1017 for loss of control and harmful manipulation risks: the #144 most recent of 660 cs.CL papers we have recorded (as of 2026-10-26). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/evaluating-deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-for-loss-of-control-and-harmful-manipulation.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable: papers.json
Related: More cs.CL papers · arXiv signals · All papers · Today in AI
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Subscribe free → See all plans →
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free
All models · All repos · By company · Daily editions