Signals 4 · free daily AI digest

Evaluating and Improving Evidence-Grounded Fact-Checking in LLMs via Multi-Round Evidence Ablation

Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-08 in cs.CL. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.

Published 2026-09-08 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-09

Category: cs.CL · 自然语言处理 · first seen 2026-09-09

Abstract

Automatic fact-checking systems assess the veracity of claims given evidence from relevant documents. Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance in fact-checking due to their general reasoning capabilities. However, it remains unclear whether they faithfully make use of the evidence provided to reach veracity judgments or rely on parametric knowledge. To investigate this, we

Read on arXiv →

#99 most recent of 186 cs.CL papers we have recorded · ↑ newer: PlannerForge: LLM Agents for Scenario-Based Testing of Motion Planners · ↓ older: WearableQA: A Benchmark for Health Reasoning over Real-World Wearable
Cite this page: Evaluating and Improving Evidence-Grounded Fact-Checking in LLMs via Multi-Round Evidence Ablation: the #99 most recent of 186 cs.CL papers we have recorded (as of 2026-09-08). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/evaluating-and-improving-evidence-grounded-fact-checking-in-llms-via-multi-round.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable: papers.json
Related: More cs.CL papers · arXiv signals · All papers · Today in AI
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Subscribe free → See all plans →
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free
All models · All repos · By company · Daily editions