Evaluating and Improving Evidence-Grounded Fact-Checking in LLMs via Multi-Round Evidence Ablation
Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-08 in cs.CL. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.
Published 2026-09-08 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-09
Category: cs.CL · 自然语言处理 · first seen 2026-09-09
Abstract
Automatic fact-checking systems assess the veracity of claims given evidence from relevant documents. Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance in fact-checking due to their general reasoning capabilities. However, it remains unclear whether they faithfully make use of the evidence provided to reach veracity judgments or rely on parametric knowledge. To investigate this, we
Read on arXiv →
Cite this page: Evaluating and Improving Evidence-Grounded Fact-Checking in LLMs via Multi-Round Evidence Ablation: the #99 most recent of 186 cs.CL papers we have recorded (as of 2026-09-08). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/evaluating-and-improving-evidence-grounded-fact-checking-in-llms-via-multi-round.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable:
papers.json
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free