Signals 4 · free daily AI digest

Diagnosing the Sources of Compositional Failure in Vision-Language Models: A Controlled Analysis

Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-25 in cs.CV. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.

Published 2026-09-25 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-28

Category: cs.CV · 计算机视觉 · first seen 2026-09-28

Abstract

Vision-language models (VLMs) often struggle with compositional reasoning tasks, but the reasons for this underperformance remain unclear. A common hypothesis is that models struggle to integrate multiple components, leading to training interventions to improve compositional binding. However, this assumption has never been directly quantified. Existing benchmarks evaluate captions only in their co

Read on arXiv →

#25 most recent of 342 cs.CV papers we have recorded · ↑ newer: KneePreM: Towards 3D Knee MRI Foundation Models via Large-Scale Unlabe · ↓ older: Vision-Based 6-DoF Grasp Pose Estimation for Robot Cloth Unfolding
Cite this page: Diagnosing the Sources of Compositional Failure in Vision-Language Models: A Controlled Analysis: the #25 most recent of 342 cs.CV papers we have recorded (as of 2026-09-25). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/diagnosing-the-sources-of-compositional-failure-in-vision-language-models-a-cont.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable: papers.json
Related: More cs.CV papers · arXiv signals · All papers · Today in AI
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Subscribe free → See all plans →
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free
All models · All repos · By company · Daily editions