Signals 4 · free daily AI digest

Comparison of techniques for fine-tuning open-weight models for entity extraction from radiology reports

Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-30 in cs.LG. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.

Published 2026-09-30 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-10-01

Category: cs.LG · 机器学习 · first seen 2026-10-01

Abstract

Converting free-text radiology reports into structured labels supports cohort building, quality assurance, and monitoring of clinical imaging models, but the strongest label extractors are hosted proprietary models whose use raises privacy, cost, and reproducibility concerns. We asked whether a fine-tuned open-weight model (Gemma-3-12B) can match GPT-4o at multi-label intracranial hemorrhage (ICH)

Read on arXiv →

#12 most recent of 349 cs.LG papers we have recorded · ↑ newer: STARS: From Spatiotemporal Dynamics to Social Representations in Human · ↓ older: Distribution Matching Distillation for Continuous Diffusion Language M
Cite this page: Comparison of techniques for fine-tuning open-weight models for entity extraction from radiology reports: the #12 most recent of 349 cs.LG papers we have recorded (as of 2026-09-30). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/comparison-of-techniques-for-fine-tuning-open-weight-models-for-entity-extractio.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable: papers.json
Related: More cs.LG papers · arXiv signals · All papers · Today in AI
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Subscribe free → See all plans →
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free
All models · All repos · By company · Daily editions