Comparison of techniques for fine-tuning open-weight models for entity extraction from radiology reports
Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-30 in cs.LG. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.
Published 2026-09-30 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-10-01
Category: cs.LG · 机器学习 · first seen 2026-10-01
Abstract
Converting free-text radiology reports into structured labels supports cohort building, quality assurance, and monitoring of clinical imaging models, but the strongest label extractors are hosted proprietary models whose use raises privacy, cost, and reproducibility concerns. We asked whether a fine-tuned open-weight model (Gemma-3-12B) can match GPT-4o at multi-label intracranial hemorrhage (ICH)
Read on arXiv →
Cite this page: Comparison of techniques for fine-tuning open-weight models for entity extraction from radiology reports: the #12 most recent of 349 cs.LG papers we have recorded (as of 2026-09-30). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/comparison-of-techniques-for-fine-tuning-open-weight-models-for-entity-extractio.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable:
papers.json
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free