Signals 4 · free daily AI digest

Choosing a PEFT Variant for Per-Patient Dysarthric ASR: A Single-Speaker Case Study on Two ASR Bases

Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-02 in cs.CL. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.

Published 2026-09-02 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-03

Category: cs.CL · 自然语言处理 · first seen 2026-09-03

Abstract

Per-patient adapters are the preferred production architecture for dysarthric automatic speech recognition (ASR), yet parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) variants have not been compared in the speaker-dependent, per-patient regime. We present a single-speaker case study comparing seven LoRA-family methods (LoRA, QLoRA, AdaLoRA, DoRA, LoHA, VeRA, VB-LoRA) on two production bases (Whisper-large-v

Read on arXiv →

#133 most recent of 186 cs.CL papers we have recorded · ↑ newer: Incremental Pooled LLM Evaluation for Cost-Effective Retrieval Model S · ↓ older: CORAL: An LLM-Native Harness for Production Recommender Systems
Cite this page: Choosing a PEFT Variant for Per-Patient Dysarthric ASR: A Single-Speaker Case Study on Two ASR Bases: the #133 most recent of 186 cs.CL papers we have recorded (as of 2026-09-02). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/choosing-a-peft-variant-for-per-patient-dysarthric-asr-a-single-speaker-case-stu.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable: papers.json
Related: More cs.CL papers · arXiv signals · All papers · Today in AI
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Subscribe free → See all plans →
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free
All models · All repos · By company · Daily editions