Signals 4 · free daily AI digest

Can JEV Support Clinical Trial Criteria Assessment?

Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-10-26 in cs.AI. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.

Published 2026-10-26 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-10-27

Category: cs.AI · 人工智能 · first seen 2026-10-27

Abstract

Clinical trial prescreening requires distinguishing unmet conditions from insufficient evidence in patient records. Given patient records, criterion questions, and predefined answer options, we retrospectively compared JEV, a non-generative decision model returning native option probabilities, with schema-constrained Qwen Flash across 2,048 test patient-condition pairs from TrialGPT and question-a

Read on arXiv →

#159 most recent of 960 cs.AI papers we have recorded · ↑ newer: The Watchtower Imperative: Lifespan-Calibrated Evaluation for Frontier · ↓ older: Audit Where Hacks Pay: Budgeted Strong-Verifier Audits Against Reward
Cite this page: Can JEV Support Clinical Trial Criteria Assessment?: the #159 most recent of 960 cs.AI papers we have recorded (as of 2026-10-26). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/can-jev-support-clinical-trial-criteria-assessment.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable: papers.json
Related: More cs.AI papers · arXiv signals · All papers · Today in AI
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Subscribe free → See all plans →
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free
All models · All repos · By company · Daily editions