Signals 4 · free daily AI digest

Calibration as a First-Class Criterion in LLM Evaluation

Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-22 in cs.CL. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.

Published 2026-09-22 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-23

Category: cs.CL · 自然语言处理 · first seen 2026-09-23

Abstract

Calibration of language models -- the alignment between expressed or implicit confidence and empirical correctness -- is a well-studied subfield within NLP. Methods to measure it already exist. The problem is adoption: outside this subfield, NLP research regularly introduces new models, datasets, and benchmarks without checking whether the model's confidence scores are meaningful. We argue that th

Read on arXiv →

#12 most recent of 227 cs.CL papers we have recorded · ↑ newer: A Semiotics-Aware Framework for Evaluating Fidelity and Coverage in Na · ↓ older: Spoken Language Models that Think Aloud
Cite this page: Calibration as a First-Class Criterion in LLM Evaluation: the #12 most recent of 227 cs.CL papers we have recorded (as of 2026-09-22). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/calibration-as-a-first-class-criterion-in-llm-evaluation.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable: papers.json
Related: More cs.CL papers · arXiv signals · All papers · Today in AI
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Subscribe free → See all plans →
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free
All models · All repos · By company · Daily editions