Signals 4 · free daily AI digest

A Ranking Approach for Measuring Calibration

Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-11 in cs.LG. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.

Published 2026-09-11 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-09-14

Category: cs.LG · 机器学习 · first seen 2026-09-14

Abstract

When providing forecasted probabilities with a predictive model, the ideal model offers perfect calibration: the true probability of the outcome (i.e., the probability that $Y=1$) exactly matches the forecasted probability $f(X)$. In practice, models inevitably exhibit calibration error, and it is therefore important to be able to measure this miscalibration to assess a model's reliability. The Ex

Read on arXiv →

#56 most recent of 215 cs.LG papers we have recorded · ↑ newer: Proportional-Fair Resource Allocation and Dual-Threshold Early-Exit In · ↓ older: CanvasAnneal: Curriculum Reinforcement Learning for Diffusion Language
Cite this page: A Ranking Approach for Measuring Calibration: the #56 most recent of 215 cs.LG papers we have recorded (as of 2026-09-11). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/a-ranking-approach-for-measuring-calibration.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable: papers.json
Related: More cs.LG papers · arXiv signals · All papers · Today in AI
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Subscribe free → See all plans →
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free
All models · All repos · By company · Daily editions