Signals 4 · free daily AI digest

A Near-Zero Monitor Readout Is Not Evidence of Behavioral Control

Paper recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-10-02 in cs.CL. Abstract reproduced from arXiv; link to the original below.

Published 2026-10-02 on arXiv · recorded by Signals 4 on 2026-10-05

Category: cs.CL · 自然语言处理 · first seen 2026-10-05

Abstract

Post-training with verifiable rewards can induce reward hacking, motivating the use of monitors within the training objective rather than solely for offline auditing. We show that a low monitor readout does not identify whether such an intervention controls behavior. In a code-generation environment whose dominant exploit is available at the start of the reasoning trace, we train policies against

Read on arXiv →

#342 most recent of 660 cs.CL papers we have recorded · ↑ newer: Single-Pass Uncertainty Heads for Claim-Level Hallucination Detection · ↓ older: Passing the Test You Trained On: Re-evaluating Prompt-Injection Detect
Cite this page: A Near-Zero Monitor Readout Is Not Evidence of Behavioral Control: the #342 most recent of 660 cs.CL papers we have recorded (as of 2026-10-02). Source: Signals 4 (Signals API) — https://data.jiangzhang.ca/signals4/t/papers/a-near-zero-monitor-readout-is-not-evidence-of-behavioral-control.html
Free to quote with attribution to “Signals 4 (Signals API)”. Machine-readable: papers.json
Related: More cs.CL papers · arXiv signals · All papers · Today in AI
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free.
Subscribe free → See all plans →
Get 4 AI signals a day by email — free
All models · All repos · By company · Daily editions